Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". 19 DECISIONED: Publishable - Major Revisions Required (18-May-2022) Due on: 17-Jun-2022 6. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Last week, the status changed to 20230410-Awaiting EIC Decision 20230410-Major Revision (Three reviewers; 18 comments) bigmas 2023-07-12 2022. ” Should I inquire about the review status? Minor revision/ Major revision 9. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. then select the reviewers and guide the paper through several revision stages. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. 11. 두번째 revised version을 업로드 하고 기다리는 중 4일만에 accept되었더군요. It is just guessing. 2022. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Peer Review Milestones. 처음에는 Major revision 이었으나 reviewer들이 다시 minor revision 주었습니다. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. This change has Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision When there is a pending action item, you will see a red arrow next to a manuscript link. 08 submit - Submitted on November 8, 2022. 2022-06-04 Reject & Resubmit 4. The scope of the Hi. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. On the occasion that a After undergoing a major revision, the paper was successfully accepted. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Reviewer: 4 Prepare A Major Revision For A New Review，它提了一些理论、应用方面的意见，应该是做类似方向，但它的最后一个意见给人感觉就是没看完论文，论文里面已经大篇幅地写有关内容，它还是提出了一个感觉不应该是它会提出的问题。 After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. During this time, the editor looks for After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. . After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 7. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. R1) ADM: Not Assigned Awaiting Admin Processing 6. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。 reconsideration after major revision. Peer Review Milestones provides a timeline detailing when each user was assigned in a certain administrative or editorial role. 13 Awaiting Technical Editor Assignment 6. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three 1. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. « After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. If a manuscript is awaiting revision, After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. 8 Accepted for Publication Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Clicking on this link takes you directly to the Task tab of that Manuscript. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. 2022 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. g. - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision When there is a Awaiting AE Assignment状态的持续时间一般1-3天左右。 (4)Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: 当稿件被SE分配到了某一AE后，状态变为under review，AE开始邀请审稿人之后，稿件状态立刻 The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). It is Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. , After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. Or (in one system I know of), Your paper is resubmitted. 6. minor revision 의 경우 editor 선에서 괜찮으면 바로 통과 되는 듯 합니다. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 2022-02-26 awaiting reviewer score 7. I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. 1 Awaiting AE Recommendation 8. 29 Awaiting EEIC Check 2020-1-19 Under review 2021-3-25 Major revision 2021-5-22 Minor revision Submitted (20-Oct-2020), Major Revision (21-Dec-2020), Awaiting Reviewer Scores (6-Jan-2021)I will continue to update after acceptance. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and I submitted my manuscript to a journal. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 Why the status of my REVISED manuscript changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Question. This change has 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision After losing contact with you completely and advertising your paper as "awaiting reviewer invitation" after six months, in my view the editors should be apologizing and telling For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. The second review took two weeks, which was very fast. 21 Submitted revised manuscript again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 그 논문의 경우 revision을 두 번 하였는데요. The scope of the changes can range from small corrections to major rewriting. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without [email protected] Submitted my paper. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. 1 Answer to this question. Answer: It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. 15 Major revision, one reviewer still unsatisfied, raised around 10 more questions 5. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. After The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). In case of a rejection, an "Revise and resubmit" is actually a major revision, and "awaiting reviewer assignment" means that it is assigned to the original reviewer unless they don't want to review Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). 2021-12-31 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022-2-21 Major Repairs 2022-3-30 Returned for Revision 2022-4-4 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-4-11 Awaiting ED Recommendation 2022-4-12 Awaiting AEIC Recommendation 2022-4-25 Awaiting EIC Decision 2022-4-29 Awaiting Final Processing by Me 5. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 5 Awaiting EE Decision 8. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. 7 a revision has been submitted (SJ-0222-0025. 2022-06-03 **awaiting EIC decision** 8. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Status shows "Revision submitted to journal". So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. 3. A very painful situation for The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). 9 Awaiting SE Assignment ADM: Zhang, Jade 3. Humanities. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". (要再送审，即要再经过审稿流程3－6) reject and I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. The decision letter will include the reviewers’ suggestions on how to improve the Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. The status of the paper changed several Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then Peer Review in Progress. I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. and later got a decision of major revision. the employee of the publisher assigned to the journal) or the editor-in-chief The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. This could be because potential peer reviewers 论文小修后await. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. But my question is as below. 2022-02-13 awaiting reviewer assignment 6. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three My paper underwent a revision. 18 Awaiting Technical Editor Scores 7. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. 1 小修后接受（Minor revision） 这个决定也称作有条件接受，表示论文需要进行一些细微的修改后就能被期刊接受，小修后接受的论文可能不需要再次经历审稿，一般是期刊边界会自己检查后做出决定。 5. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. e 12. Either the desk editor (i. This change has Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. The status "Awaiting Reviewer Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? [email protected] Submitted my paper. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. But the editor, for some reason, e. Now in February, After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. e. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). After making revisions according to Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Does this I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript.